A PSL calculator that measures instead of guessing. 478 facial landmarks score your symmetry and proportions 0–100, mapped to the 1–8 PSL scale — no login, photo stays in your browser.
Upload a photo
Drag and drop or click to browse
JPG, PNG up to 10MB
Your photo never leaves your device
A PSL score is a facial attractiveness rating on a 1–8 scale that originated on the looksmaxxing forums PuaHate, SlutHate, and Lookism (hence "PSL"). Unlike the casual 1–10, the PSL scale pins average at 4, treats 5 as clearly above average, and reserves 6+ for the rarest faces — 8 is a theoretical ceiling anchored to a handful of celebrity bone structures. There is no official PSL rating: forum scores are crowd opinion, and most online PSL tests are guesses dressed up as numbers.
This test takes the opposite approach: it measures the geometry the research actually links to attractiveness — symmetry, facial thirds and fifths, golden-ratio proportion — from 478 landmarks on your photo, scores it 0–100 with the formula shown, and converts that to a PSL band using percentile anchors. Same photo, same score, every time.
The bands below are the community's convention, documented honestly — including how rare the top actually is. If a test rates everyone a 6, it isn't a PSL scale.
8 — PSL God
A handful of faces, everReserved by the community for a short list of celebrity faces treated as the aesthetic ceiling — prime Delon, O'Pry-tier model bone structure. By construction almost nobody rates an 8; it functions as the scale's anchor, not a band people land in.
7–7.5 — Chad / Stacy
Fraction of a percentExceptional harmony across every feature at once — the faces that get scouted for modeling. If a stranger's first reaction to a plain photo is disbelief, this is the band the forums mean.
6–6.5 — Chadlite
~Top 1–2%Clearly, consistently attractive to almost every rater. One or two features may fall short of the ideal canon, but the overall face turns heads in person, not just in curated photos.
5–5.5 — High-tier normie
~Top 10–20%Above average and generally read as good-looking, especially groomed and photographed well. Most 'attractive friend' faces live here. On a casual 1–10 this band gets called a 7 or 8.
4–4.5 — Normie
The majorityAverage by construction — 4 is the scale's midpoint and where most faces genuinely land. Normal features, normal harmony; day-to-day attractiveness is driven more by grooming, style, and expression than geometry.
1–3.5 — Below the scale's average
Below-median geometryFurther from the scale's photographic canon — which is a statement about distance from one aesthetic tradition, not about real-world attractiveness. Plenty of faces here are attractive in ways a static-photo canon can't read.
The test above returns a 0–100 harmony score. The conversion below anchors that score's percentile bands to the community's own rarity assumptions — given as ranges on purpose, because a PSL rating to two decimal places is false precision no matter who computes it.
Harmony 90–100 → PSL ≈ 6+
Top ~5% of analyzed faces — Chadlite territory on the community's percentile assumptions.
Harmony 80–89 → PSL ≈ 5 – 6
Top ~15% — high-tier normie to borderline Chadlite.
Harmony 70–79 → PSL ≈ 4.5 – 5.5
Top ~35% — above-average into high-tier normie.
Harmony 60–69 → PSL ≈ 4 – 4.5
The median band — normie range, where most people score.
Harmony Below 60 → PSL ≈ 3.5 – 4
Distinctive geometry vs the canon. The photo, angle, and expression often matter more than the face here — re-test with a neutral, front-facing shot.
Read this before taking the number seriously
PSL is an acronym of three now-defunct looksmaxxing forums — PuaHate, SlutHate, and Lookism — whose users developed a shared 1–8 rating convention for facial attractiveness. 'PSL score' and 'PSL scale' now refer to that rating system: 4 is defined as average, 5 is clearly above average, 6+ is rare, and 8 is a theoretical ceiling reserved for a handful of celebrity faces. There is no official body behind it; it's internet culture with unusually consistent conventions.
4 — by definition. The PSL scale is built so that 4 is the population average, which makes it deliberately harsher than the casual 1–10 scale where people hand out 7s freely. Most people genuinely land between 3.5 and 4.5, a 5 puts you roughly in the top 10–20%, and 6+ is claimed far more often than it occurs. If a random test rates everyone a 6 or 7, it isn't using the PSL scale — it's flattering you.
No official PSL rating exists — forum ratings are crowd opinion, and every 'PSL calculator' online is an approximation of that opinion. What this test does differently is measure instead of guess: it maps 478 facial landmarks in your browser, scores symmetry, facial thirds, facial fifths, and golden-ratio proportion 0–100 with the formula shown, then converts that score to a PSL band using percentile anchors. Same photo, same score, every time — which is more than can be said for asking strangers on a forum.
The PSL scale compresses the top and stretches the middle. On a casual 1–10, 'average' drifts up to 6–7 because raters are polite; on the PSL scale, average is pinned at 4 and each half-point above it is meant to be exponentially rarer. A PSL 5 roughly corresponds to a 7–8 on the casual scale, and a PSL 6 to a 9. That harshness is the point — the scale was invented by communities that considered normal ratings inflated.
The measurable components move by different amounts. Symmetry responds to breaking one-sided habits and to facial-muscle balance; lower-face proportions shift with body-fat percentage; and grooming, hairstyle, skin quality, and photo technique change how every component reads without changing bone. Skeletal geometry — jaw width, eye spacing, midface length — is fixed in adulthood, and the 'hardmaxxing' procedures the forums obsess over are expensive, risky, and often deliver less than a leaner body composition would. Start with our looksmaxxing guide's softmaxxing tier.
The scale itself, no — the 1–8 bands, the Chad/normie labels, and the celebrity anchors are community convention. The ingredients this test measures, yes: bilateral symmetry, proportional balance, and averageness are documented predictors of rated attractiveness across decades of research (Rhodes 2006, Little 2014). So treat the geometry score as the real measurement and the PSL band as a translation into a dialect the looksmaxxing internet happens to speak.
Three reasons. The scale is calibrated harsher than social ratings — friends rate on the inflated 1–10 where average is 7. The test only sees static geometry — expression, charisma, voice, style, and familiarity all raise real-world attractiveness and are invisible to a landmark mesh. And photo conditions move the score by several points: a tilted angle, a smile, or harsh side-light reads as asymmetry. A neutral, front-facing, evenly lit photo is the only fair input.